Showing posts with label Kids. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kids. Show all posts

Most Popular Baby Names: Jacob, Sophia Top Latest List

Most Popular Baby Names: Jacob, Sophia Top Latest List -  Are your kids' names on the most-popular list?Jacob and Sophia were the most popular names for babies born in 2011, the Social Security Administration revealed on Monday. The annual list was peppered with names from the Bible and from pop culture, with a surprising amount of influence from Reality TV.

Jacob topped the list for boys' names for the 13th year in a row, but there were a few surprises in the Top 10: For the first time since 1948, Michael is no longer in the top five and Anthony (a Top 10 favorite in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2010) has dropped off the list. But Mason made its Top 10 debut as the second most-popular boy's name in 2011 -- and yes, that's the name of Kourtney Kardashian's first-born child. Coincidence?


"It shows what we're paying attention to, what we're thinking about," Laura Wattenberg, creator of the babynamewizard.com, told The Associated Press. "Today, you can't walk through a supermarket without learning more than you hoped to know about the Kardashian family. That's just reality."

"Celebrity naming is just about the exposure, and about everybody hearing that name at the same time," she added. "It's not about the fame, it's about the name."

The names on the boys' list tend to stay the same from year to year -- Michael, David, John, James, William, Matthew, and Robert have been favorites for generations -- which is what makes Mason's leap from number 12 to number 2 so remarkable. The girls' list gets reorganized more often. In the past five years, four names have held the top girls' spot -- Emily was the number 1 name from 1996 to 2007, but since then Emma, Isabella, and now Sophia have been the most popular. (Though it may seem like you know a million Jennifers, that name hasn't been in the top five since 1988.)

While some names are perennially popular, other tend to rocket their way up the list. According to the Social Security Administration, the fastest riser on the girls' list is Briella -- possibly thanks to Briella Calafiore, the blonde hairdresser of "Jerseylicious" and "Glam Fairy" fame. On the boys' side, it's Brantley, though it's not known whether the spike is thanks to country music star Brantley Gilbert or University of Florida quarterback John Brantley.

The Social Security Administration compiles its annual lists using data supplied by parents when they apply for their newborn's Social Security number. The agency has tracked baby names every year since 1880 -- that year, the most popular names were John and Mary; in 2012, neither of those names even made the top 10. Here are the ones that did: (  Team Mom )

For boys:
  • Jacob
  • Mason
  • William
  • Jayden
  • Noah
  • Michael
  • Ethan
  • Alexander
  • Aiden
  • Daniel

For girls:
  • Sophia
  • Isabella
  • Emma
  • Olivia
  • Ava
  • Emily
  • Abigail
  • Madison
  • Mia
  • Chloe

READ MORE - Most Popular Baby Names: Jacob, Sophia Top Latest List

Just the most stupid target for those student rioters to pick

Just the most stupid target for those student rioters to pick - Further education is hardly worth the Government investing in, if the standard of research behind Saturday’s student demo against spending cuts is anything to go by.

The breakaway group that headed for Piccadilly had evidently chosen their target, or “secret location”, well in advance: the grocers to Her Majesty, Fortnum & Mason. This target presumably represented to these inheritors of the finest traditions of direct action everything that was Cameronesque, fat-cat, exploitative and privileged.

To which the only reasonable response is the one that students might most readily recognise: “Duh!”


http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/files/2011/03/fortnum_1011832c.jpg


Fortnums is owned by the Weston family, which probably ranks third behind the Wellcome Foundation and all the Sainsbury trusts added together in the amount of money it gives away – yes, gives away in addition to the tax it pays – to exactly the causes that are close to the heart of UKUncut and the services that it was supposedly marching to maintain.

Now, pay attention at the back, especially the youth that I spotted in the Fortnums atrium holding a sign saying “Share the Wealth” without any apparent sense of irony. The Garfield Weston Foundation owns nearly 80 per cent of Wittington Investments, a company registered in the UK, which is the ultimate holding company of Associated British Foods, Fortnum & Mason and interior stylist Heal’s. Dividends flow upwards to the Foundation, principally from ABF given that retail is having a tough time and Fortnums has just been through a major investment programme, which then distributes grants (a word students may still be familiar with).

Typically, the Foundation distributes about £40 million a year, though in good times much more. A glance at the trustees’ report – I presume UKUncut’s organisers know how to use the internet – would reveal that the Foundation gives grants to schools and universities, as well as to hospitals and housing associations. The Weston Foundation gave £25 million, for instance, to Oxford University last year alone for the development of the Bodleian Library, so I hope any Oxford students who “occupied” Fortnums will honourably refrain out of shame from using that facility for the remainder of their studies, out of respect for the Westons.

There is barely a new college benefactors’ plaque in the country that doesn’t bear the Weston name. So much for “Share the Wealth” (you muppet). And it’s difficult to think of an institution more likely to step in to the gap left by Government funding. The trustees’ in their latest report explicitly say that they have prudently made some reserves because they “have also been mindful of the possibility of requests for urgent funding being made by charities which have had their funding from other sources cut due to the difficult economic conditions”.

So well done, you students. Of all the locations you could have picked, you’ve actually chosen to bite one of the hands that promises to feed you – and one of the most generous hands at that.

Not that these were particularly hungry protesters. Not exactly in the Jarrow tradition. I hear these sons and daughters of our bourgoisie made their way through the food halls to loot the fine wines and Champagne. Clearly close to the the harsh realities of the 21st-century.

Incidentally, I also hear that afternoon tea was served throughout on the fourth floor, with AndrĂ© undisturbed at the piano. Which I suppose means that it really was a thoroughly middle-class riot throughout – while the children played downstairs, their mummies and daddies were properly “kettled” upstairs. ( telegraph.co.uk )


READ MORE - Just the most stupid target for those student rioters to pick

A generation of cotton-wool kids: Parents' safety fears keeping children indoors

A generation of cotton-wool kids: Parents' safety fears keeping children indoors. Children have far less freedom than their parents did when they were younger, a survey has found.

Growing concerns over safety mean most now wait almost two years longer than their parents did before experiencing life unsupervised.

A quarter of children aged 15 and under are not allowed to sleep over at a friend’s house, compared with just 4 per cent of their parents’ generation, the study says.


Father holding son's hand

Treading carefully: Parents' growing concerns over safety mean they give their own children far less freedom than they had themselves when they were the same age, a survey has found


Six in ten are forbidden from using public transport without a parent present and 43 per cent are not allowed to visit their closest park alone.

Sixty-five per cent of the 6,100 adults interviewed – 1,464 of whom were parents of children under the age of 18 – viewed the world as a more dangerous place these days.

Just over half (54 per cent) said ‘stranger danger’ was their greatest worry, followed by bullying (74 per cent), mugging (47 per cent) and road danger (34 per cent).

As a result, a generation of children is now staying indoors for longer periods of time and is restricted to going out only with a parent present.


Pugh if you are going to the garden


On average, children today can look forward to walking to school on their own by the age of 11, use public transport on their own at 12, and babysit their brother or sister by the time they are 14.

In contrast, parents say they were allowed to walk to school unaccompanied at the age of nine, use public transport alone by the time they were 11, and babysit a sibling by 12.

Of those adults who took part in the online survey, only 4 per cent said they were banned from sleep- overs at friends’ homes when they were 15 or younger.

Only 2 per cent were forbidden from using public transport and the same number forbidden from going alone to the local park or into the town where they lived.

A third of the adults who completed the survey said they were uneasy about limiting their children’s liberties but felt anxious about the dangers beyond the home.

Yet, according to hospital statistics, nearly a million children are treated every year after accidents in the home that could have been prevented.

The research was carried out on behalf of LV= Streetwise, a charity that educates children about safety.


  • Childhood is being suffocated by a ‘just in case’ mentality that has saddled schools with a barrage of health and safety regulations, a leading headmaster will say today.


The Government has ‘lost touch with reality’, imposing 139 regulations on independent schools but with only 24 relating to education, according to Richard Cairns, head of Brighton College.

The rest cover health and safety, registering appointments, complaints procedures and checks on teachers, support staff and governors.

It might be only a matter of time before mattresses had to be laid out under trees in school grounds ‘just in case’ children fall, he is due to tell a conference organised by the Independent Schools Council.

He adds: ‘Every pound we spend on compliance is a pound we don’t spend on teaching and learning.’( dailymail.co.uk )


READ MORE - A generation of cotton-wool kids: Parents' safety fears keeping children indoors

Birth dates with a warning

Birth dates with a warning. Environmental conditions, infections, light exposure and even the availability of certain nutrients can all affect a baby's development. Here, we shows how much influence the seasons can have on babies . . .

SUDDEN INFANT DEATH SYNDROME

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) is the most common cause of the death of babies under a year old.

Several factors have been implicated, although the exact mechanism behind cot death has not yet been established.

Professor Peter Helms, of Aberdeen University's Medical School, is an expert on the effects of seasonality. He says: 'Babies born between February and May are at significantly lower risk of SIDS than babies born between August and November.'

More cot deaths occur during the winter months and the most susceptible age is between two and four months, putting September babies at greatest overall risk.

During the summer, only a third of the number of winter deaths take place, making April the least risky birth month.

Professor Helms adds: 'Even though there are statistical differences between the times of greatest and least risk, the overall numbers are very small, so no one should be unduly worried if their baby is due in September.'

Ann Deri-Bowen, of the Cot Death Association, says: 'The seasonal differences have reduced since our campaign started. But most important of all is to follow our advice - place babies on their backs, don't let them overheat, don't use duvets and don't smoke either during or after pregnancy.'

SCHIZOPHRENIA

Numerous studies have shown that schizophrenics tend to be born in late winter and early spring.

Robin Murray, Professor of Psychological Medicine at the Institute of Psychiatry, says: 'There is a real seasonal influence. Between January and April numbers peak at 10 pc above average, but then rates decline to 10 pc below average between August and October. 'In the second half of pregnancy, the connections between neural cells in the brain cortex are made. If the mother gets a feverish illness during the latter half of pregnancy, it may disturb these growing neural connections.

'Most doctors think that schizophrenia arises when these neural networks are slightly faulty, and that later in life, when you are under stress, it triggers the illness.

'There is much evidence supporting the idea that winter illnesses such as viral infections, influenza and fevers during the second half of pregnancy can increase the chances of a baby developing schizophrenia. We also know that malnourished mothers are at greater risk of having a baby who develops schizophrenia.

'In the UK, one in every 100 people gets schizophrenia. Your risk doubles to two in every 100 if you are in your mother's womb in winter and she contracts a feverish illness. It's enough to interest statisticians but shouldn't worry the general population.'

Seasonal variations have also been noted in autism, peaking in March, and major depression, which peaks between March and May.

The decrease in natural daylight in winter may play a part. Fluctuations of the hormone melatonin - known as the hormone of darkness, because it is triggered by the shortening days of winter - are thought to be involved. BRONCHIOLITIS is a serious infection of the small airways deep inside the lung, which can trigger asthma. Affecting babies under 18 months, it can be brought on by different viruses, many of which normally cause nothing more serious than a cold.

Paediatrician Dr Harvey Mar-covitch says: 'Bronchiolitis has an annual epidemic between November and March. It starts off like a cough or cold, but rapidly progresses deep into the small tubes of the lung, resulting in severe breathing difficulties, and some babies die from it. The younger you are, the worse it tends to be.

'If you're born in March or April, you're already eight months old by the time the yearly epidemic starts, and therefore stronger than babies born in August and September, who would be only two to three months old.

'If parents have asthma or eczema, and therefore have a high risk of having an asthmatic child, they may want to know that by having their child in early spring they will at least be giving it the best chance of avoiding bronchiolitis and perhaps avoid triggering asthma.'

SPINA BIFIDA

Spina Bifida is a congenital condition caused when the spinal column and surrounding tissues fail to form properly. It tends to run in families, although a lack of folic acid during the crucial first month of pregnancy, when the spinal structures are being formed, has been implicated.

Researchers have found evidence of seasonal variance in spina bifida, with more cases occurring with babies born in January and fewer among those born in July.

Professor Helm says: 'One reason may be that women who conceive in the early spring are lacking in folic acid, due to the fact that fresh fruit and vegetables have been in shorter supply during winter and early spring.'

If this theory is valid, the seasonality of spina bifida should fade as more women of childbearing age take countermeasures to prevent it by using folic acid supplements all year round.

ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE

A child born in late summer will be among the youngest in the class, and at a disadvantage compared with those born almost a year before.

Gaynor Sbuttoni, an educational psychologist, says: 'Academically, it is probably better to be born in early autumn. Socially and emotionally, the difference between the youngest and the eldest in a class can be huge and it can be hard for the younger ones to cope.

However, at puberty the eldest might get teased for being developed, but the youngest may be taunted for being underdeveloped. In this situation, children born between January and March fare best.'

Even IQ isn't immune to seasonal effects - studies in the Sixties revealed that there was a higher incidence of retardation (where the IQ fell below 70) among winter babies. ( dailymail.co.uk )



READ MORE - Birth dates with a warning

Obesity Seems to Alter Heart Structure

Obesity Seems to Alter Heart Structure -- Obesity is a major risk factor for left atrial enlargement, which increases the risk of atrial fibrillation, stroke and death, a new study shows.

Atrial fibrillation is the most common type of arrhythmia (an irregular heart rhythm or heartbeat).

Researchers analyzed data on 1,212 men and women, aged 25 to 74, in Germany who were followed for 10 years. The study authors concluded that obesity and hypertension cause structural and functional changes in the heart and are independent predictors of left atrial enlargement (LAE).

The highest incidence of LAE after 10 years was seen in obese people -- 31.6 percent compared to baseline prevalence of 10 percent among all study participants.

The findings, published in the Nov. 17 issue of the Journal of the American College of Cardiology, confirm the strong association between obesity and LAE reported in previous research. Some of those studies found that excess weight may affect left atrial size at an early age, potentially predisposing young obese people to future heart problems.

The authors of the new study said early assessment and intervention, especially among younger obese patients, is crucial to prevent the premature onset of cardiac remodeling -- changes in heart size, shape and function -- caused by LAE.

But they noted that it isn't clear how much weight management or moderate weight loss can improve LAE. Further research is needed.
(HealthDay News)


READ MORE - Obesity Seems to Alter Heart Structure

Facebook In Legal Showdown Over Privacy

Facebook In Legal Showdown Over Privacy. Facebook has been hit by legal action in the US at the same time as Canadian authorities are examining the site to see whether it breaks privacy laws.


Facebook logo is reflected in an eye

Concerns over Facebook's privacy policies are being investigated in Canada


A deadline for the site to comply with Canadian legislation expired on Monday.

The row could have implications for Facebook's 250 million users.

Canada's privacy commissioner wrote a report last month highlighting "serious gaps" in the way users' personal information is protected, and gave the site 30 days to respond.

At the same time the deadline passed, Facebook was hit with a civil lawsuit from five users in the US.

They claim the site breaks privacy laws by misleading them over how their information is used.

Facebook spokesman Barry Schnitt said the company "see no merit in this suit and we plan to fight it".

If the site lost either battle, it could force it to change the way it operates.

Canadian authorities will review whether Facebook brought it the changes it called for before deciding if they will pursue it through the courts.


Facebook

250 million use Facebook


A spokeswoman told Sky News Online it was too early to tell what action would be taken.

"We're hopeful that Facebook has responded to the concerns we raised in our investigation report, but we're not in a position to determine that at this time - we need to review their actions thoroughly," she said.

The commissioner's team were most worried by the difficulty users have in deleting their accounts, rather than just deactivating them.

"Apps", such as games and quizzes, may also leave accounts open to abuse, as they may be able to access more personal information than necessary.

The site unveiled more privacy controls in June to enable members to be more specific about what details can be seen or used.

Many users have joined groups calling for stronger safeguards on content. ( sky.com )



READ MORE - Facebook In Legal Showdown Over Privacy

Hundreds Of Facebook Groups Are 'Hijacked'

Hundreds Of Facebook Groups Are 'Hijacked' . An anonymous group has exploited a security loophole in the social networking site Facebook by 'hijacking' hundreds of groups. Taking control of the Facebook groups allows them to change the name of the group, bombard members with messages and edit details.

The 'hijackers', who call themselves Control Your Info, insist they will not misuse the data as they only want to raise awareness of the dangers.


Facebook

'Control Your Info' leave messages on hundreds of Facebook groups


They found if the administrator of a Facebook group leaves, any user can appoint themselves as a replacement.

Hundreds of groups have been affected, all receiving the same warning: "Hello, we hereby announce that we have officially hijacked your Facebook group.


Facebook logo

300m use Facebook worldwide


"This means we control a certain part of the information about you on Facebook.

"If we wanted we could make you appear in a bad way which could damage your image severly (sic).

"For example we could rename your group and call it something very inappropriate and nasty, like 'I support paedophile's rights'. But have no fear - we won't."

The renegade group's website claims the security side of social media has been "more or less neglected".

They have posted a YouTube video which warns while gaffes made in real life can be repaired, "your online mistakes will be there forever".

Facebook said in a statement: "There has been no hacking and there is no confidential information at risk.

"The groups in question have been abandoned by their previous owners, which means any group member has the option to make themselves an administrator in order to continue communication to the group.

"Group administrators have no access to confidential information and group members can leave a group at any time.

"For small groups, administrators can simply edit a group name or info, moderate discussion, and message group members.

"The names of large groups cannot be changed nor can anyone message all members.

"In the rare instances when we find that a group has been changed inappropriately, we will disable the group, which is the action we plan for these groups." ( sky.com )



READ MORE - Hundreds Of Facebook Groups Are 'Hijacked'

Has The Facebook Photo Mystery Been Solved?

Has The Facebook Photo Mystery Been Solved? . Three men who claim to be the mystery holidaymakers at the centre of a Facebook sensation have told Sky News their story is not a hoax.


Facebook

These pictures were posted on a Facebook group called Needle In A Haystack


More than 210,000 Facebook users are following Australian Danny Cameron's hunt to find the owner of a camera he found on Mykonos.

He hoped the theory anybody in the world can be contacted within "six degrees of separation" would lead him to find the tourists whose pictures were saved on the memory card.

And three friends have come forward to claim they can end the intrigue.

Pierre Paoli, Edouard Hostein and Julien Kopp have told Sky News Online they are pictured in the holiday snaps.

"It's not a hoax, it is absolutely real," Mr Paoli, who works in London, insisted. "We were on holiday and our friend Marie Cecile lost her camera."

He only discovered the group when a friend stumbled upon it.

Facebook

Is this Marie Cecile?

Mr Hostein, who separately named Marie Cecile as the owner, described it as an "amazing story, unbelievable".

"I confirm that the camera's owner is one of my friends and I am on a picture with two other friends, Pierre Paoli and Julien Kopp."

When the Facebook group was first created on October 17 it attracted just 40 people. Within days membership had spiralled to nearly 250,000.

Mr Cameron told Sky News Online: "It is a total long shot and could have died in the water, but it looks like the world loves honesty... It's good to see so many people believing in the idea."

He said he was keeping some details secret to help him identify the camera's real owner. He has not commented on the friends' claim. ( sky.com )



READ MORE - Has The Facebook Photo Mystery Been Solved?

Facebook Alibi Saves Jailed Teenager In US

Facebook Alibi Saves Jailed Teenager In US. A New York teenager accused of armed robbery has been cleared of all charges after his Facebook page provided him with an alibi.

Rodney Bradford spent 12 days in prison after being arrested on suspicion of holding up two people close to his home in Brooklyn.



Robbery suspect Rodney Bradford is cleared of all charges after his Facebook page provided him with an alibi. Pic: New York Post

Rodney Bradford at his home. Picture: New York Post


But the 19-year-old was eventually released after an update on the social networking site placed him at his father's flat across town in Harlem.

The message posted one minute before the robbery occurred on October 17 asked "WHERE MY IHOP?", a reference to a popular US pancake house.

It was intended for his pregnant girlfriend, who he hoped would cook him breakfast.

Instead, it provided proof that Mr Bradford was nowhere near the robbery when it happened.

Prosecutors dropped the charges after experts confirmed the message was typed from his father's keyboard.

It backed-up witness statements claiming the teenager was at his dad's house at the time of the incident.

Mr Bradford could have been jailed for 25 years if he was convicted.

Speaking to the New York Post, he said: "They had me on Rikers Island (New York jail) for 12 days. It was really miserable."

He added: "If it wasn't for Facebook I'd still be on Rikers Island."

His stepmother, Ernestine Bradford, added: "Facebook saved my son.

"Normally, we yell at our kids, 'Oh, you're on the computer!" It's completely different. If it wasn't for Facebook, my son wouldn't be here." ( sky.com )



READ MORE - Facebook Alibi Saves Jailed Teenager In US

One In Five Kids A Victim Of Cyber Bullies

One In Five Kids A Victim Of Cyber Bullies . One in five children has been targeted by cyberbullying.Children are being taunted, threatened and insulted via the internet and their mobile phones, according to the poll by the Anti-Bullying Alliance (ABA).

Parents are being urged to supervise their children's internet access after the study revealed 20.5% of 10 and 11-year-olds had been subjected to abuse.

More than a fifth (22%) said they did not know how to protect themselves against cyber bullies.

Tips On Cyberbullying From ABA

  1. Know which websites your children are visiting and help them find the "report abuse" and "block sender" options.
  2. Make sure your child "acts thoughtfully" online, and understands that images and messages posted online stay there and that mobile phone texts can be forwarded.
  3. Tell your child not to reply to unpleasant messages and to keep any evidence.
  4. Tell children never to give out personal details and to protect internet passwords.
  5. Anyone who is being bullied should tell an adult they trust

Computer mouse


And six in 10 (61%) said they thought a good way to stop cyberbullying would be for parents to know how to deal with it.

The survey reveals two-fifths (40%) of the more than 200 10 and 11-year-olds surveyed said they used social networking sites "sometimes".

Almost a fifth (19%) said they used them "a lot", despite many sites specifying that users should be over 13.

The figures were released to mark the start of National Anti-Bullying Week.

A second survey of more than 1,000 parents found that almost a quarter (23%) said they had, or would, allow their child of 10 or under to have unsupervised web access.

It is crucial that we ensure they know how to stay safe online, and that their parents know how to help them. Clearly more research is needed on this emerging issue.

Christopher Cloke, ABA chair

The ABA recommended that parents know which websites their children visit, and help them find the "report abuse" and "block sender" options.

ABA chair Christopher Cloke said: "Parents and schools need to be aware that cyberbullying is affecting younger age groups as more children get mobile phones and have computer access.

"It's crucial that we ensure they know how to stay safe online, and that their parents know how to help them. Clearly more research is needed on this emerging issue."

The ABA advice came as Victims' Champion Sara Payne said parents should snoop on their children's internet use to protect them from paedophiles.

She called for adults to install monitoring software on computers used by youngsters and admitted she checked up on her own children.

The ABA Stay Safe in Cyberspace report questioned 227 10 and 11-year-olds in October, and a BMRB (British Market Research Bureau) poll questioned 1,163 parents of children aged eight to 14 in England during October. ( sky.com )



READ MORE - One In Five Kids A Victim Of Cyber Bullies